Eastern Partnership of “different speeds”

Issue 11 of EaP Think Bridge Digest is out focusing of EaP Brussels Summit aftermath

Subscribe for Newsletter

The Brussels Eastern Partnership summit did not bring neither breakthroughs, nor surprises, putting sustainability and stability of the member countries at the forefront. So far, it seems, the relations with the European Union will be reduced to the lowest common denominator of the six partner states.

The European ambitions of the Association Agreements signatories were not supported in the EU. No “carrots” after the visa-free travel and the free trade zone were promised to Ukraine, Georgia, and Moldova. No words on the in-depth cooperation with the leaders of the initiative in the “Eastern Partnership Plus” format were mentioned in the final Declaration. Moreover, all attempts to introduce the possible, yet remote aspiration for the EU membership made the opposite effect. Instead the European partners suggested the neighbors should pay more attention to the fulfillment of the commitments they had already undertaken.

Only Armenia was quite satisfied with the summit results as it signed the new Comprehensive and Enhanced Partnership Agreement. Azerbaijan and Belarus negotiate on elaborating the similar basic agreements.

What is the future of the Eastern Partnership policy? Is the EU ready to work with its neighbors at “different speeds”? The results of the Brussels summit analyzed by Vitali Martynyuk.

More about the summit outcomes significance for each of the EaP states can be found in our monthly reviews.